Uncertainty in MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates estimated from T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

TitleUncertainty in MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates estimated from T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsZhang J, Kim S
JournalMagn Reson Med
Volume72
Issue2
Pagination534-45
Date Published2014 Aug
ISSN1522-2594
KeywordsAlgorithms, Body Water, Computer Simulation, Contrast Media, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Kinetics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Models, Biological, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity
Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the uncertainty in estimation of MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates in T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.

METHODS: Simulated DCE-MRI data were used to assess four kinetic models; general kinetic model with a vascular compartment (GKM2), GKM2 combined with water exchange (SSM2), adiabatic approximation of the tissue homogeneity model (ATH), and ATH combined with water exchange (ATHX).

RESULTS: In GKM2 and SSM2, increase in transfer constant (K(trans)) led to underestimation of vascular volume fraction (vb), and increase in vb led to overestimation of K(trans). Such coupling between K(trans) and vb was not observed in ATH and ATHX. The precision of estimated intracellular water lifetime (τi) was substantially improved in both SSM2 and ATHX when K(trans) > 0.3 min(-1). K(trans) and vb from ATHX model had significantly smaller errors than those from ATH model (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated the feasibility of measuring τi from DCE-MRI data albeit low precision. While the inclusion of water exchange improved the accuracy of K(trans), vb, and the interstitial volume fraction estimation (ve), it lowered the precision of other kinetic model parameters within the conditions investigated in this study.

DOI10.1002/mrm.24927
Alternate JournalMagn Reson Med
PubMed ID24006341
PubMed Central IDPMC3942367
Grant ListP30 CA016087 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA160620 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
1R01 CA160620 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Institute: 
MRI Research Institute (MRIRI)

Weill Cornell Medicine
Department of Radiology
525 East 68th Street New York, NY 10065