Title | Rapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2019 |
Authors | Jafari R, Sheth S, Spincemaille P, Nguyen TD, Prince MR, Wen Y, Guo Y, Deh K, Liu Z, Margolis D, Brittenham GM, Kierans AS, Wang Y |
Journal | J Magn Reson Imaging |
Volume | 50 |
Issue | 3 |
Pagination | 725-732 |
Date Published | 2019 09 |
ISSN | 1522-2586 |
Keywords | Feasibility Studies, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Iron, Iron Overload, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is needed to guide iron-chelating therapy for patients with transfusional iron overload. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of automated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to measure the LIC. PURPOSE: To develop a rapid, robust, and automated liver QSM for clinical practice. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 13 healthy subjects and 22 patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: 1.5 T and 3 T/3D multiecho gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence. ASSESSMENT: Data were acquired using a 3D GRE sequence with an out-of-phase echo spacing with respect to each other. All odd echoes that were in-phase (IP) were used to initialize the fat-water separation and field estimation (T *-IDEAL) before performing QSM. Liver QSM was generated through an automated pipeline without manual intervention. This IP echo-based initialization method was compared with an existing graph cuts initialization method (simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical shift, SPURS) in healthy subjects (n = 5). Reproducibility was assessed over four scanners at two field strengths from two manufacturers using healthy subjects (n = 8). Clinical feasibility was evaluated in patients (n = 22). STATISTICAL TESTS: IP and SPURS initialization methods in both healthy subjects and patients were compared using paired t-test and linear regression analysis to assess processing time and region of interest (ROI) measurements. Reproducibility of QSM, R *, and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) among the four different scanners was assessed using linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Liver QSM using the IP method was found to be ~5.5 times faster than SPURS (P < 0.05) in initializing T *-IDEAL with similar outputs. Liver QSM using the IP method were reproducibly generated in all four scanners (average coefficient of determination 0.95, average slope 0.90, average bias 0.002 ppm, 95% limits of agreement between -0.06 to 0.07 ppm, ICC 0.97). DATA CONCLUSION: Use of IP echo-based initialization enables robust water/fat separation and field estimation for automated, rapid, and reproducible liver QSM for clinical applications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:725-732. |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.26632 |
Alternate Journal | J Magn Reson Imaging |
PubMed ID | 30637892 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC6929208 |
Grant List | R01 NS095562 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States R01 NS090464 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States R01 DK116126 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States R01 CA181566 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States |
Related Institute:
MRI Research Institute (MRIRI)