Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.

TitleQuantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsKee Y, Liu Z, Zhou L, Dimov A, Cho J, de Rochefort L, Seo JKeun, Wang Y
JournalIEEE Trans Biomed Eng
Volume64
Issue11
Pagination2531-2545
Date Published2017 11
ISSN1558-2531
KeywordsAlgorithms, Artifacts, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Computer Simulation, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) solves the magnetic field-to-magnetization (tissue susceptibility) inverse problem under conditions of noisy and incomplete field data acquired using magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, sophisticated algorithms are necessary to treat the ill-posed nature of the problem and are reviewed here. The forward problem is typically presented as an integral form, where the field is the convolution of the dipole kernel and tissue susceptibility distribution. This integral form can be equivalently written as a partial differential equation (PDE). Algorithmic challenges are to reduce streaking and shadow artifacts characterized by the fundamental solution of the PDE. Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimation can be employed to solve the inverse problem, where morphological and relevant biomedical knowledge (specific to the imaging situation) are used as priors. As the cost functions in Bayesian QSM framework are typically convex, solutions can be robustly computed using a gradient-based optimization algorithm. Moreover, one can not only accelerate Bayesian QSM, but also increase its effectiveness at reducing shadows using prior knowledge based preconditioners. Improving the efficiency of QSM is under active development, and a rigorous analysis of preconditioning needs to be carried out for further investigation.Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) solves the magnetic field-to-magnetization (tissue susceptibility) inverse problem under conditions of noisy and incomplete field data acquired using magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, sophisticated algorithms are necessary to treat the ill-posed nature of the problem and are reviewed here. The forward problem is typically presented as an integral form, where the field is the convolution of the dipole kernel and tissue susceptibility distribution. This integral form can be equivalently written as a partial differential equation (PDE). Algorithmic challenges are to reduce streaking and shadow artifacts characterized by the fundamental solution of the PDE. Bayesian maximum a posteriori estimation can be employed to solve the inverse problem, where morphological and relevant biomedical knowledge (specific to the imaging situation) are used as priors. As the cost functions in Bayesian QSM framework are typically convex, solutions can be robustly computed using a gradient-based optimization algorithm. Moreover, one can not only accelerate Bayesian QSM, but also increase its effectiveness at reducing shadows using prior knowledge based preconditioners. Improving the efficiency of QSM is under active development, and a rigorous analysis of preconditioning needs to be carried out for further investigation.

DOI10.1109/TBME.2017.2749298
Alternate JournalIEEE Trans Biomed Eng
PubMed ID28885147
Grant ListR01 NS095562 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 NS090464 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 NS072370 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
S10 OD021782 / OD / NIH HHS / United States
Related Institute: 
MRI Research Institute (MRIRI)

Weill Cornell Medicine
Department of Radiology
525 East 68th Street New York, NY 10065