Effect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.

TitleEffect of T2* correction on contrast kinetic model analysis using a reference tissue arterial input function at 7 T.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsZhang J, Freed M, Winters K, Kim SG
JournalMAGMA
Volume28
Issue6
Pagination555-63
Date Published2015 Dec
ISSN1352-8661
KeywordsAnimals, Contrast Media, Gadolinium DTPA, Image Enhancement, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental, Mice, Mice, Inbred BALB C
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effect of T2* correction on estimation of kinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI data when a reference-tissue arterial input function (AIF) is used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI data were acquired from seven mice with 4T1 mouse mammary tumors using a double gradient echo sequence at 7 T. The AIF was estimated from a region of interest in the muscle. The extended Tofts model was used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters in the enhancing part of the tumor, with and without T2* correction of the lesion and AIF. The parameters estimated with T2* correction of both the AIF and lesion time-intensity curve were assumed to be the reference standard.

RESULTS: For the whole population, there was significant difference (p < 0.05) in transfer constant (K(trans)) between T2* corrected and not corrected methods, but not in interstitial volume fraction (ve). Individually, no significant differences were found in K(trans) and ve of four and six tumors, respectively, between the T2* corrected and not corrected methods. In contrast, K(trans) was significantly underestimated, if the T2* correction was not used, in other tumors for which the median K(trans) was larger than 0.4 min(-1).

CONCLUSION: T2* effect on tumors with high K(trans) may not be negligible in kinetic model analysis, even if AIF is estimated from reference tissue where the concentration of contrast agent is relatively low.

DOI10.1007/s10334-015-0496-1
Alternate JournalMAGMA
PubMed ID26239630
PubMed Central IDPMC4657861
Grant ListP30 CA016087 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA160620 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
1R01 CA160620 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
Related Institute: 
MRI Research Institute (MRIRI)

Weill Cornell Medicine
Department of Radiology
525 East 68th Street New York, NY 10065