Diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics for classification of Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

TitleDiagnostic performance of MRI radiomics for classification of Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsShahidi R, Baradaran M, Asgarzadeh A, Bagherieh S, Tajabadi Z, Farhadi A, Korani SSotoudehni, Khalafi M, Shobeiri P, Sadeghsalehi H, Shafieioun A, Yazdanifar MAmin, Singhal A, Sotoudeh H
JournalAging Clin Exp Res
Volume35
Issue11
Pagination2333-2348
Date Published2023 Nov
ISSN1720-8319
KeywordsAlzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Sensitivity and Specificity
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disease. Early diagnosis of AD and its precursor, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), is crucial for timely intervention and management. Radiomics involves extracting quantitative features from medical images and analyzing them using advanced computational algorithms. These characteristics have the potential to serve as biomarkers for disease classification, treatment response prediction, and patient stratification. Of note, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics showed a promising result for diagnosing and classifying AD, and MCI from normal subjects. Thus, we aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of the MRI radiomics for this task.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: A comprehensive search of the current literature was conducted using relevant keywords in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to August 5, 2023. Original studies discussing the diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics for the classification of AD, MCI, and normal subjects were included. Method quality was evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools.

RESULTS: We identified 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 5448 participants. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate to high. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI radiomics for differentiating AD from normal subjects were 0.92 (95% CI [0.85; 0.96]) and 0.91 (95% CI [0.85; 0.95]), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI radiomics for differentiating MCI from normal subjects were 0.74 (95% CI [0.60; 0.85]) and 0.79 (95% CI [0.70; 0.86]), respectively. Also, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI radiomics for differentiating AD from MCI were 0.73 (95% CI [0.64; 0.80]) and 0.79 (95% CI [0.64; 0.90]), respectively.

CONCLUSION: MRI radiomics has promising diagnostic performance in differentiating AD, MCI, and normal subjects. It can potentially serve as a non-invasive and reliable tool for early diagnosis and classification of AD and MCI.

DOI10.1007/s40520-023-02565-x
Alternate JournalAging Clin Exp Res
PubMed ID37801265
PubMed Central ID3299979

Weill Cornell Medicine
Department of Radiology
525 East 68th Street New York, NY 10065